Can reviewers record and export reasons for exclusion?
Yes. Reviewers can record reasons for exclusion, especially during full-text review where PRISMA-related reporting often requires clear exclusion categories. These reasons can be reviewed, resolved, and exported for use in reporting or audit files.
Good exclusion-reason practice matters. Teams should define exclusion categories before full-text review, avoid overlapping categories where possible, and ensure reviewers use categories consistently. If categories change later, the team should decide whether existing decisions need cleanup.
Exports can support internal QA, sponsor review, manuscript preparation, or PRISMA flow documentation, but final reporting should still be checked by the review team.
More in AccuScreener
Can a user be assigned multiple roles as admin, reviewer, and screener in the same project?
chevron_right
Can I add or remove team members after a project has been activated?
chevron_right
Can I modify the protocol at the full-text screening stage?
chevron_right
Can I perform summary extraction using AccuScreener?
chevron_right
How many references can I upload/process?
chevron_right
Once I delete a project, will I be able to retrieve it?
chevron_right
What are the features of different roles (Admin, reviewer, and screener) in a project?
chevron_right
What are the screening steps that AccuScreener supports?
chevron_right
What is the estimated time required to process the results?
chevron_right
What is the use of advanced screening?
chevron_right