Can reviewers record and export reasons for exclusion?
Yes. Reviewers can record reasons for exclusion, especially during full-text review where PRISMA-related reporting often requires clear exclusion categories. These reasons can be reviewed, resolved, and exported for use in reporting or audit files.
Good exclusion-reason practice matters. Teams should define exclusion categories before full-text review, avoid overlapping categories where possible, and ensure reviewers use categories consistently. If categories change later, the team should decide whether existing decisions need cleanup.
Exports can support internal QA, sponsor review, manuscript preparation, or PRISMA flow documentation, but final reporting should still be checked by the review team.
More in AccuScreener
Can AccuScreener perform summary extraction using Mini-DET?
chevron_right
Can AI act as an independent second reviewer?
chevron_right
Can different eligibility criteria be used for each screening stage?
chevron_right
Can references be added after screening begins?
chevron_right
Can the protocol or screening settings be changed after screening begins?
chevron_right
Does AccuScreener identify duplicate references?
chevron_right
Does AccuScreener support both title/abstract and full-text screening ?
chevron_right
Does AccuScreener support independent double screening and conflict resolution?
chevron_right
What is the difference between Manual, AI Assistant, and AI Screener modes?
chevron_right
Which full-text and supplementary-document formats are supported?
chevron_right