Can AI act as an independent second reviewer?
Yes, where AI Screener mode is configured. In this mode, AI can act as an independent reviewer stream alongside a human reviewer. The AI output can then be compared with human screening decisions in a way that resembles double screening.
The team configures the AI run, provides the criteria, reviews disagreements, and decides how conflicts are resolved. AI decisions become part of the reviewable workflow record, with final inclusion and exclusion decisions kept under human governance.
AI as a second reviewer can be useful for scale and consistency, but teams should pilot the setup, confirm the protocol fit, and document how AI-generated decisions were used.
More in AccuScreener
Can a user be assigned multiple roles as admin, reviewer, and screener in the same project?
chevron_right
Can I add or remove team members after a project has been activated?
chevron_right
Can I modify the protocol at the full-text screening stage?
chevron_right
Can I perform summary extraction using AccuScreener?
chevron_right
How many references can I upload/process?
chevron_right
Once I delete a project, will I be able to retrieve it?
chevron_right
What are the features of different roles (Admin, reviewer, and screener) in a project?
chevron_right
What are the screening steps that AccuScreener supports?
chevron_right
What is the estimated time required to process the results?
chevron_right
What is the use of advanced screening?
chevron_right