Title, abstract, and full-text screening

AI Screening for Systematic Reviews with Reviewer Control

AccuScreener supports first-pass and full-text review using manual or configurable AI-assisted workflows. Teams can assign screeners, preserve blinded decisions, identify disagreements, and use human adjudication before eligibility decisions are finalised.

14 days · 10,000 included AI credits · No credit card required

Inside AccuScreener

A visible workflow, not a black-box result.

AccuScreener supports first-pass and full-text review using manual or configurable AI-assisted workflows. Teams can assign screeners, preserve blinded decisions, identify disagreements, and use human adjudication before eligibility decisions are finalised.

  • check_circleProject configuration
  • check_circleReviewer adjudication
  • check_circleExportable history
AccuScreener product visual showing systematic review screening and decision workflows
Workflow

How AccuScreener works

01

Configure criteria and reviewers

Define eligibility criteria, select the screening mode, and assign human and AI reviewer roles.

02

Screen citations and full texts

Work manually, view AI recommendations, or keep independent AI decisions blinded until comparison.

03

Resolve disagreements

Surface decision and criteria conflicts for human adjudication, which takes precedence.

Capabilities

What the workflow supports

Three screening modes

Use Manual, AI Assistant, or AI Screener configurations at project level.

Blinded workflows

Independent decision streams can remain hidden until comparison.

Conflict management

Decision and criteria disagreements are identified for structured resolution.

Structured delivery

Outputs your team can review and use

  • Title-and-abstract decisions
  • Full-text eligibility decisions
  • Conflict and criteria-disagreement records
  • Progress and Excel exports
Responsible use

Important workflow boundaries

These limits are stated so teams can evaluate the product using realistic expectations.

  • Recommendations depend on clear, complete eligibility criteria.
  • Full-text AI processing requires usable study text.
  • High-stakes eligibility decisions should retain human review.
Frequently asked questions

Questions about AccuScreener

How do AI Assistant and AI Screener differ?

AI Assistant shows suggestions to a human screener. AI Screener performs an independent evaluation that can remain blinded until comparison.

Can two humans screen without AI?

Yes. Manual reviewer assignments and conflict resolution do not require AI screening.

Can reviewers override AI?

Yes. Human review and adjudication take precedence.

Explore the product with your own workflow

Start a free SYMPRO AI trial

Get 14 days and 10,000 included AI credits, with no credit card required.