Manual
Both title/abstracts based first-pass and full-text screening performed by human.
How SYMPRO AI applies artificial intelligence in evidence synthesis while preserving human oversight, auditability, and data protection.
SymproAI is an AI-powered literature review suite that supports systematic reviews, targeted reviews, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment with efficient automation. Researchers remain involved at every stage to review decisions and validate the final conclusions.
SYMPRO AI supports systematic reviews, targeted reviews, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and report-writing workflows. Automation accelerates repetitive work, but researchers remain involved in review, validation, and final interpretation.
| Workflow stage | Platform support | Researcher responsibility | Traceable output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Question and protocol | Structured project and PICOS configuration | Define and approve the review method | Documented project criteria |
| Search | Search strategy development and database translation | Validate databases, terms and final strategies | Search strings and retrieved citations |
| Screening | Manual and configurable AI-assisted workflows | Review decisions and resolve disagreements | Eligibility decisions and reasons |
| Critical appraisal | Assessment-tool recommendations and structured processing | Select the appropriate tool and confirm judgements | Reviewable risk-of-bias assessments |
| Extraction | Template-led extraction from selected documents | Verify extracted evidence against sources | Structured evidence tables |
| Reporting | Evidence-linked drafting and revision support | Interpret findings and approve final text | Editable report and evidence trail |
SYMPRO AI uses large language models through several LLM API providers and applies retrieval-augmented generation for PDF-grounded screening and extraction tasks. Project data is not used to train SYMPRO AI models, and human verification remains required.
Teams can choose how much AI participates in screening, from reviewer-led workflows to fully automated screening with targeted human review. Each mode keeps the decision path visible so reviewers understand how work was completed.
Screening can be performed using artificial intelligence (AI) with configurable levels of automation:
Both title/abstracts based first-pass and full-text screening performed by human.
AI provides suggestions during title-abstract and full-text screening by applying predefined criteria such as PICOS & hierarchy. In this mode, AI decisions are available for human review.
AI screens studies in parallel with human analysts in a double-blind workflow, enabling side-by-side comparison without exposing either decision stream upfront.
AI is the only screener. Human reviewers will only review the screening decisions without conducting initial screening.
Manual and AI-assisted screenings can be configured in either review mode, depending on the protocol and the level of reviewer independence required.
One decision stream is hidden during screening to reduce reviewer influence while maintaining structured adjudication.
Independent screening paths stay hidden until comparison, supporting unbiased discrepancy detection and manual resolution.
In double-blind workflows, disagreements are surfaced automatically so the reviewer can move straight to manual resolution.
All other modules (Accusearch for searches, Accusynthesis for data extractions, Accuscripter for study linkage and report generation) are powered by AI with human-in-loop review.
Project admin or human reviewer can sample, review, and override any decision - whether made by analysts or AI.
Developers can set AI usage limits at the organization level, permitting AI operations only within approved governance boundaries.
All decisions or changes made are recorded with the user initials, indicating whether it was generated by AI, analysts or reviewer.
Each AI-generated evidence can be traced to specific article, with supporting text visibly highlighted in the source PDF.
For screening decisions and extracted fields, the AI's reasoning is displayed so reviewers can verify and validate each outcome, instead of being forced to trust the system blindly.
All AI-driven decisions can be exported to support external human review. Human experts remain fully accountable for protocols, final judgments, and interpretation of results.
SymproAI is designed with the core principle that users remain fully responsible for every screening decision. Here's how that works in practice:
Project admins configure protocols, AI modes, and decision rules before reviewers begin work.
Reviewers can see who made each decision, including decisions generated by AI.
AI outputs are presented as suggestions, not as final decisions.
Credit limits help governance teams control how much AI is used across the organisation.
A reviewer can override any AI suggestion at any time.
The selected publications below cover AccuScript evidence-synthesis work and evaluations involving SYMPRO. They are presented as research and methodology evidence, not as customer testimonials or adoption claims.
Published evaluations can help teams understand how AI-assisted workflows perform in specific settings. Results may vary by topic, protocol, dataset, and reviewer configuration.
Additional verified evaluations can be added here as their methods and publication details become available.
SYMPRO AI combines role-based access and company-level data separation with verified GDPR and ISO 9001 credentials. Certificate scope and supporting information are available from AccuScript.
Ensures strong data privacy and protection practices.
Follows internationally recognised quality management standards.
Data privacy and protection practices are structured around GDPR-aligned controls.
Quality-management processes follow recognized international standards.
Project data is not used to train or improve SYMPRO AI models.
Role-based permissions restrict visibility to authorized users and configured admins.
Full details are available in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. Organisations can contact AccuScript to request certificate and security documentation relevant to their evaluation.
SymproAI does not replace human expertise. Researchers should:
Human-in-the-loop controls that keep admins/reviewers accountable.
Accelerates Evidence Synthesis (ES) by identifying studies, extracting data, assessing risk of bias, and summarizing findings.
Documented methods, human review checkpoints, and published evaluations provide evidence for responsible use while further validation continues.
Structured workflows support repeat review updates; AccuScripter supports cumulative report updates from Version 1 through Version N.
Transparent AI assistance with visible rationale and decision flags.
Configurable workflows to suit different review standards.
Role-based access, company-level separation, and documented data-handling controls are used to protect project information.
Teams evaluating or using SYMPRO AI can access:
For further information or questions, please reach out to contact@accuscript.org
Full details are also available in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Trust & Security page.