AccuSynthesis product guide

Turn research papers into structured, reviewable evidence

This guide explains the complete AccuSynthesis workflow—from defining the project protocol and designing a data-extraction template to understanding dimensions, processing papers, reviewing results, and exporting evidence.

Overview

What AccuSynthesis does

AccuSynthesis is a structured data-extraction workflow for systematic literature reviews. You define what information should be collected, upload the included publications, review the extraction design, and let the system produce evidence tables that remain editable and exportable.

It supports clinical effectiveness, safety, health economics, diagnostic accuracy, epidemiology, qualitative evidence, scoping reviews, and mixed evidence projects. The review type provides guidance; it does not force every project into the same template.

What you provideWhat AccuSynthesis preparesWhat you receive
Project protocol and extraction goalA reviewable extraction structureStructured rows and columns
Research papers and optional supplementsPaper-specific row identitiesEvidence linked to each paper
Manual, imported, converted, or generated templateDescriptions, groups, types, and constraintsExcel and Word exports
How it works

The complete workflow

Each stage remains reviewable. AI-generated content is presented as a draft before it becomes part of the project.

  1. 1

    Define the project

    Give the project a clear title and provide a concise protocol describing the evidence scope.

  2. 2

    Upload the evidence

    Add the included papers and any supported supplementary documents, then confirm that text extraction is ready.

  3. 3

    Create the template

    Build manually, import an AccuSynthesis workbook, convert a client workbook, or generate a draft from the protocol and goal.

  4. 4

    Review the structure

    Check sheets, sections, groups, columns, descriptions, shared dimensions, value types, and allowed options.

  5. 5

    Process the papers

    AccuSynthesis discovers relevant row identities and fills the requested fields while preserving template boundaries.

  6. 6

    Review and export

    Inspect the extracted evidence, add more files when needed, and export all or selected results to Excel or Word.

Figure 1. AccuSynthesis workflow
Protocol
Papers
Template
Review
Extraction
Results
Project context

Give the system a focused protocol

The final project protocol is the main scope boundary used when generating descriptions and extracting data. It should describe the review—not the application or the extraction technology. The final normalized protocol can contain up to approximately 700 words.

Include the information that changes extraction decisions

  • Population or evidence population
  • Interventions, exposures, tests, or phenomena
  • Comparators, where applicable
  • Outcomes and measures of interest
  • Relevant timepoints and subgroups
  • Study designs and inclusion boundaries
  • Special formatting or extraction instructions
Template creation

Four ways to create the extraction template

Every method produces the same supported hierarchy, so the resulting template can be reviewed and edited in the builder.

MethodBest used whenRequired inputHow AI is usedReview
Build manuallySmall or highly customized formsProtocol and user-defined fieldsOptional description generationEdit directly in builder
Import structured templateReusing an exported AccuSynthesis templateStructured workbookNo reinterpretation requiredVerify exact import
Convert raw workbookMigrating a client extraction workbookProtocol and raw workbookInterprets headers and generates descriptionsReview converted draft
Generate with AIStarting from review requirementsProtocol and goal; workbook/PDF summaries optionalProposes the complete templateReview generated draft

Convert an existing client workbook

  1. Enter or normalize the project protocol.
  2. Select Convert existing workbook and upload the raw Excel file.
  3. Choose which worksheets should become extraction sheets. Hidden worksheets remain visible for review but are excluded by default.
  4. Review the detected header depth for every included worksheet and correct it when necessary.
  5. Add optional conversion instructions for unusual merged headers or project-specific grouping.
  6. Generate the draft, review its descriptions and hierarchy, then apply it to the project.
Template organization

Sheets, sections, groups, and columns

The hierarchy gives every short column name a complete meaning. A column named N is ambiguous by itself, but its full path can mean Outcomes → Efficacy → Overall Survival → N.

Figure 2. Example template hierarchy
Outcomes sheet
Efficacy section
Overall Survival group
NHazard ratioCI lowerCI upperp-value
LevelPurposeExample
SheetA table with one row structure and a related subject.Outcomes
SectionA broad division spanning related column groups.Efficacy
Column groupFields that must be interpreted together.Overall Survival
ColumnOne value to extract, with a stable key and description.Hazard ratio
Rows and columns

Dimensions and measures

This is the most important template-design decision. A dimension identifies what a row represents. A measure describes the result represented by that row.

Figure 3. Decide whether a field is a dimension or a measure
If this value changes, does the result refer to a different arm, population, timepoint, outcome, instrument, event, or grade?
YesDimensionA different row may be needed.
NoMeasureIt is another value in the same row.

Single-row and multi-row sheets

Row modeUse it whenExample
One row per articleThe requested values normally occur once for the paper or study.Citation details, study design, country
Multiple rows per articleValues vary across reported arms, populations, outcomes, events, or timepoints.Clinical outcomes, adverse events, economic scenarios

Shared dimensions

Multi-row sheets expose their shared dimensions before extraction. You can add, remove, reorder, rename, enable, or disable them. Existing clinical projects retain Treatment Name, Analysis Group, Subgroup Type, and Timepoint as their default structure, but other evidence domains can use different dimensions.

Review or sheet typeCommon dimensionsCommon measures or values
Clinical effectivenessTreatment, analysis population, subgroup, outcome, timepointN, events, mean, SD, HR/RR/OR, CI, p-value
Safety / adverse eventsTreatment, safety population, event name, grade, timepointEvaluated N, event N, percentage, relative effect
Health economicsIntervention, comparator, population, scenario, outcome, time horizonCost, QALYs, incremental values, ICER, utility
Diagnostic accuracyIndex test, threshold, population, reference standardTP, FP, TN, FN, sensitivity, specificity, AUC
EpidemiologyPopulation, exposure, outcome, region, age/sex group, periodSample N, cases, prevalence, incidence, RR/OR/HR
Qualitative evidenceTheme, subtheme, participant group, setting, contextFinding, quotation, interpretation, confidence
Figure 4. The width-versus-height trade-off
More specific columnsWider templateFewer rows
More dimensionsNarrower templateMore rows
Building row identity

Make a column an active row dimension

A column can be labelled as a dimension candidate in Column settings, but that label alone does not change how rows are created. To make its reported values identify separate rows, move the column into Row Structure as either a shared or local row dimension.

The builder uses the wording Use as shared row dimension and Use as local row dimension. This action moves the field—it does not copy it—so the same name is not sent twice to AI or shown twice in the result and exported workbook.

Figure 5. Turning an ordinary template column into part of row identity
Ordinary columnOutcome Name
Column settingsChoose Row dimension
Move into Row StructureShared or local
Active row identityOS and PFS can become separate rows

Choose shared or local

ChoiceUse it whenWhere it appliesExample
Shared row dimensionThe field identifies rows across most or all groups in the sheet.The sheet and its row schemas.Treatment, analysis population, subgroup, timepoint
Local row dimensionThe field identifies rows only for one repeating type of result.The selected row schema and every group sharing that schema.Outcome Name, Instrument, Event Name, Grade, Economic Scenario
Ordinary measure columnThe field describes a value for an existing row and does not decide whether another row is needed.Its own column group.N, mean, SD, HR, CI, event percentage, ICER

Fixed groups, repeating groups, and row schemas

ConceptWhat it meansWhen to use it
Fixed groupUses the sheet's shared dimensions and introduces no local dimensions of its own.The columns have a known meaning in the header, such as dedicated OS HR and PFS HR groups.
Repeating groupUses a row schema with one or more local dimensions.Names vary by paper, such as Outcome Name, Event Name, Grade, Theme, or Scenario.
Row schemaThe reusable definition of the shared and local values that together identify one row.A repeating group needs a clear rule for what makes two rows different.
Groups sharing one row schemaTwo or more repeating groups use exactly the same canonical row list and are merged side by side.Only when all those groups must align to the same dimension combinations.
Independent row schemasGroups discover separate row lists and are appended as different result-row types.Outcome rows and adverse-event rows have different identities or granularity.

Worked builder example

Suppose a repeating Outcome Result group initially contains these ordinary columns:

BeforeRole in the intended tableBuilder action
Outcome NameDetermines whether the row is OS, PFS, response rate, or another reported outcome.Set to Row dimension, then choose Use as local row dimension.
NA value reported for the outcome row.Keep as an extracted value.
EstimateA value reported for the outcome row.Keep as an extracted value.
Confidence IntervalA value reported for the outcome row.Keep as an extracted value.

After the move, the structure becomes:

Row schemaLocal dimensionMeasure columnsPossible reported rows
Outcome Result rowsOutcome NameN, Estimate, Confidence IntervalOverall Survival; Progression-Free Survival
  1. Enable Multi Row Data Extraction for the sheet.
  2. For a local dimension, first set the containing column group to Repeating rows.
  3. Open the tune control beside the ordinary column and choose Row dimension.
  4. Select Use as shared row dimension or Use as local row dimension.
  5. Confirm the move, then review its name, description, value type, options, and row-schema assignment.
  6. Open the Excel-layout preview and confirm the dimension appears once before the applicable measures.
Worked examples

How the extracted rows change with template design

Example A — Fixed wide outcomes

Overall survival and progression-free survival have their own measure columns. Outcome identity is encoded in the column paths, so it does not create additional rows.

StudyTreatmentTimepointOS HROS CIPFS HRPFS CI
Study 1Drug A12 months0.720.58–0.890.810.67–0.98
Study 1Control12 monthsReferenceNRReferenceNR

Design lesson: Use this pattern when the outcome set is known and stable. It creates a wider table with fewer rows.

Example B — Repeating long outcomes

A generic Outcome Name dimension identifies each reported outcome, while the same measure columns are reused.

StudyTreatmentOutcome NameTimepointNEstimateCI
Study 1Drug AOverall survival12 months2400.720.58–0.89
Study 1Drug AProgression-free survival12 months2400.810.67–0.98

Design lesson: Use this pattern when outcome names vary or are not known in advance. It creates a narrower table with more rows.

Example C — Adverse events and severity grades

Event name and grade identify distinct reported rows. Measures describe how often each event occurred.

StudyTreatmentEvent NameGradeEvaluated NEvent NPercentage
Study 1Drug ANauseaAny grade1504228.0
Study 1Drug ANauseaGrade ≥315064.0
Study 1Drug AFatigueAny grade1503020.0

Design lesson: Create only event and grade combinations actually reported by the paper.

Example D — Economic scenarios

Scenario and time horizon can identify distinct economic results even when the intervention and comparator remain unchanged.

StudyInterventionComparatorScenarioTime HorizonIncremental CostIncremental QALYICER
Study 2Intervention AUsual careBase caseLifetime12,5000.6220,161/QALY
Study 2Intervention AUsual careSensitivity analysis10 years9,8000.4123,902/QALY

Design lesson: Dimensions are domain-neutral. They should describe whatever makes one reported result different from another.

Field configuration

Column roles, value types, and options

Use the tune control beside a column to define the expected content. Clear constraints improve consistency and make exported templates easier to use.

SettingChoicesMeaningExample
RoleArticle-level, dimension, measureDescribes semantic purpose. A dimension candidate becomes active only after it is moved into Row Structure.Outcome Name can be moved to a local dimension; hazard ratio remains a measure.
Value typeText, number, select one, select multiple, yes/no, dateDescribes the form of the expected value.Randomized is Yes/No.
Allowed optionsUser-defined listPreferred or closed vocabulary for select fields.RCT, cohort, case-control
Discover valuesOn or offControls whether a clearly reported unlisted value may be retained.Allow a previously unseen country.

How controlled options behave

  • Matching values are normalized to the configured option spelling.
  • When discovery is disabled, an unlisted value is returned as not reported rather than invented or forced.
  • When discovery is enabled, a clearly reported unlisted value can be retained for review.
  • Select-one and Yes/No fields can receive dropdown validation in compatible Excel exports.
  • Select-multiple options are preserved in metadata, but standard Excel validation cannot select multiple items in one cell without macros.
Evidence processing

Upload, review, and process papers

  1. Upload included papers using the required project filename convention.
  2. Wait until text extraction marks each usable file as ready.
  3. Review the template summary: sheets, sections, groups, columns, row modes, and file readiness.
  4. Start processing and monitor file-level progress.
  5. Retry only failed files or failed worksheet conversion where targeted retry is available.
  6. When results are complete, add more papers later; new extracted rows are appended below existing results while the template remains fixed.
Review and delivery

Reviewing and exporting extracted evidence

The extracted-data viewer follows the same hierarchy and color logic as the Excel-layout preview, making groups easier to recognize before export.

CapabilityWhat it provides
Extracted-data viewerScrollable sheet tables with row dimensions, sections, groups, and columns.
Data-availability statusShows Extracted, No eligible data, Partial, or Failed for each paper, worksheet, and row schema. No eligible data includes a reason but does not create an artificial all-NR result row.
Excel exportColored hierarchical headers, filters, configured dimensions, extracted rows, and a separate Extraction Status audit sheet.
Word exportStructured tables retaining the template hierarchy, selected evidence, and extraction-status audit information.
Selective exportExport all results or choose specific sheets and column groups.
Reusable templateProtocol, descriptions, roles, types, options, dimensions, and hidden structured metadata for exact re-import.
Quality guidance

Designing a reliable extraction template

DoAvoid
Use one clear concept per column. Combine unrelated values in a single field.
Keep related statistics in the same semantic group. Mix survival, safety, and quality-of-life measures without hierarchy.
Use dimensions only when a changed value identifies another result. Turn every descriptive field into a dimension.
Write descriptions that state evidence, unit, and expected format. Repeat only the column name in the description.
Use separate sheets when evidence families have different row structures. Create one extremely sparse sheet for unrelated evidence.
Use closed options for stable vocabularies. Use closed lists when legitimate values are unpredictable.

Before starting extraction

  • The protocol describes the intended evidence scope.
  • Every included sheet has the correct single-row or multi-row mode.
  • Shared dimensions identify rows without duplicating measure columns.
  • Sections and groups make short column names unambiguous.
  • Every column has a useful description and suitable value type.
  • Select options are mutually clear and discovery is configured intentionally.
  • The Excel-layout preview matches the intended final evidence table.
  • All papers required for the run are marked ready.
Frequently asked questions

Common questions

Ready to build an extraction project?

Open AccuSynthesis, provide the review protocol, and choose the template-creation method that best matches your existing material.

Open AccuSynthesis